Four Ways to Change Coalitions: Agents, Dependencies, Norms and Internal Dynamics
نویسندگان
چکیده
We introduce a new formal approach to social networks in order to distinguish four ways in which coalitions change. First, the agents in the network change. Second, dependencies among the agents change, for example due to addition or removal of powers and goals of the agents. Third, norms can introduce normative dependencies for obligations and prohibitions. Fourth, coalitions can change due to internal processes. We propose a number of stability measures to identify each one of the four proposed sources of coalitions’ dynamics and the consequences they induce on the stability
منابع مشابه
Power and Politics in the Global Health Landscape: Beliefs, Competition and Negotiation Among Global Advocacy Coalitions in the Policy-Making Process
Background Advocacy coalitions play an increasingly prominent role within the global health landscape, linking actors and institutions to attract political attention and resources. This paper examines how coalitions negotiate among themselves and exercise hidden forms of power to produce policy on the basis of their beliefs and strategic interests. Methods This paper examines the beliefs and ...
متن کاملOutput Consensus Control of Nonlinear Non-minimum Phase Multi-agent Systems Using Output Redefinition Method
This paper concerns the problem of output consensus in nonlinear non-minimum phase systems. The main contribution of the paper is to guarantee achieving consensus in the presence of unstable zero dynamics. To achieve this goal, an output redefinition method is proposed. The new outputs of agents are functions of original outputs and internal states and defined such that the dynamics of agents a...
متن کاملHow does community context influence coalitions in the formation stage? a multiple case study based on the Community Coalition Action Theory
BACKGROUND Community coalitions are rooted in complex and dynamic community systems. Despite recognition that environmental factors affect coalition behavior, few studies have examined how community context impacts coalition formation. Using the Community Coalition Action theory as an organizing framework, the current study employs multiple case study methodology to examine how five domains of ...
متن کاملA Model for Developing the Best Strategy Combination Based on Balanced Scorecard, Fuzzy Net Present Value and Game Theory
Increasing competition has caused that organizations using evaluation, control and performance improvement try to maintain their supremacy in global markets. Balanced Scorecard model is one of the ways that can help organizations achieve this goal. In this study, the limitations of selecting performance criteria and executive strategies in balanced scorecard are discussed and two tools of curre...
متن کاملThe Regional Context of Human Rights in the Middle East
Human rights situation in the Middle East (ME) is a central concern in contemporary political as well as academic discourses. There is a considerable amount of literature on the subject, both academic and journalistic, in the Western world. A large part of that literature blames the ME in different ways for its ‘terrible’ conception and treatment of human rights norms. They typically, do not he...
متن کامل